• 网站首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 绘图要求
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

用户登录

  • 作者登录
  • 审稿登录
  • 编辑登录
  • 读者登录

在线期刊

  • 当期目次

  • 过刊浏览

  • Email Alert

  • RSS

  • 文章点击排行

  • 文章下载排行

下载专区

  • 《地球环境学报》征稿简则

  • 《地球环境学报》绘图要求

  • 国标文献著录格式

  • 标点符号用法

友情链接

  • 中国科学院
  • 中国科学院地球环境研究所
引用本文:张帆,贺茂勇,李斌,罗家馨.2023.许家窑-侯家窑遗址年代学研究进展[J].地球环境学报,14(3):272-283
ZHANG Fan, HE Maoyong, LI Bin, LUO Jiaxin.2023.Research progress on age of Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site[J].Journal of Earth Environment,14(3):272-283
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【HTML】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 4802次   下载 3354次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
许家窑-侯家窑遗址年代学研究进展
张帆,贺茂勇,李斌,罗家馨
1. 中国科学院地球环境研究所 黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,西安 710061
2. 太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,太原 030024
摘要:
人类的起源与演化一直是考古学及其他学科研究的重点。泥河湾盆地,是我国古人类文化的重要组成部分,在泥河湾盆地的许家窑-侯家窑遗址,正处于现代人起源、扩散的关键时期,为解决我国甚至东亚的现代人起源问题具有举足轻重的作用。前人对遗址进行过多次系统挖掘,开展了一系列不同方法的年代学工作,然而其文化层年代却有较大的争议。本文对许家窑-侯家窑遗址文化层的年代进行系统总结,通过对前人用不同测年方法获得年代进行综合对比。结果表明:不同方法测定的许家窑-侯家窑遗址文化层的年代差距过大,难以确定文化层的年代。许家窑-侯家窑遗址文化层的年代的不确定,严重影响了众多学者对于我国现代人起源的进一步研究。年代测量方法虽然众多,但是不同测年方法,有着不同的测年区间,因此后期需要根据许家窑-侯家窑遗址的年代区间来选择适合的测量方法,并使用不同材料来进行对比分析获得最为准确的年代。
关键词:  许家窑-侯家窑遗址  泥河湾盆地  古人类起源  年代学进展
DOI:10.7515/JEE221015
CSTR:32259.14.JEE221015
分类号:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重大项目(41991252);陕西省杰出青年科学基金(2022JC);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB40000000)
英文基金项目:Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41991252); Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (2022JC); Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB40000000)
Research progress on age of Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site
ZHANG Fan, HE Maoyong, LI Bin, LUO Jiaxin
1. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China
2. College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
Abstract:
Background, aim, and scope The origin and evolution of human beings have always been the focus of archeological research. The legacy of Xujiayao man found in Nihewan Basin formed a critical period for the emergence and spread modern people. Nevertheless, there remains ongoing debate regarding the age of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site. This article aims to examine the chronology of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site, with a particular emphasis on addressing notable concerns raised in prior research. Materials and methods This study mainly summarizes the principle and measurement results of dating the cultural layers with different methods of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site. Results At present, the main methods for measuring the age of the cultural layer of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site are paleomagnetic dating and electron spin resonance. The main methods for determining the age of the cultural layer of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site include paleomagnetic dating, electron spin-resonance spectroscopy, 14C, optically stimulated luminescence, Uranium-series disequilibrium dating and 26Al/10Be. However, the conclusions drawn by the different methods are very different, with the largest difference of 500 ka BP. The Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site is 500 ka BP with paleomagnetic methods and K/Ar dating, while the youngest site is 16 ka BP using the rhino bone fossil measured by 14C. Discussion This paper summarizes and analyzes various hypotheses about the origin and dispersal of modern humans at home and abroad. Currently, some scholars believe that modern humans may have a single origin in Africa, while others believe that modern humans evolved from Homo sapiens in different regions. However, after entering the 21st century, both hypotheses have undergone subtle changes, and both tend to be African. Modern humans provide most genes for human beings around the world. The Xujiayao man, discovered in Nihewan Basin in China, is about 100 ka BP old and lies in the key period of the mergence and spread of modern Chinese people, so it is great significance. However, the age of the Xujiayao site has long been a matter of great controversy, and the conclusions drawn from physical dating methods are quite different. The reason may be that the paleoenvironmental evolution of Nihewan Basin is not combined with dating methods, and there is a lack of constraints on age determination. Conclusions At present, the age of Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site is difficult to unify, so it is necessary to improve the working methods and do more research. Recommendations and perspectives To determine the age of the Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site, it is important to link the ancient human activities in the cultural layer of the site with the changes of the ancient environment at that time, especially the extinction of ancient lake water and volcanoes. The extinction of ancient lake water may provide a lower age limit for the cultural layer of the site; by determining the active period of the Datong volcano and combining it with the stratigraphic age, the cultural age of the site can be better understood.
Key words:  Xujiayao-Houjiayao Site  Nihewan Basin  the origin of ancient humans  chronology progress
您是本站第  访问者
版权所有:《地球环境学报》编辑部 陕ICP备11001760号-3
主办:中国科学院地球环境研究所 地址:西安市雁塔区雁翔路97号 邮政编码:710061
电话:029-62336252 电子邮箱:jee@ieecas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司